Talk:James K. Galbraith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Old comments[edit]

How NPOV is the word "progressive"? Do those who disagree with Galbraith consider themselves to be against progress? Michael Hardy 22:40, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC)

The opposite of the literal sense of progressive would be reactionary, which probably would be a good way of describing people on the other side of the fence. However, progressive has a more general meaning associated with leftwing. But I realize none of these terms are ideal... Liberal means different things in the US and Europe, left is pretty vague, radical isn't quite right in this context... -- Viajero 10:01, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC)
From my experience with him, I would say that he would consider himself to be a member of "the progressive movement", or at least in ideological accord with much of it. Kd5mdk 16:20, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keynesian, not Post-Keynesian?[edit]

Isn't Galbraith more of a post-Keynesian than a Keynesian? He wrote the forward to Warren Mosler's book, after all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.195.135.188 (talk) 05:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes you're right. It was me who originally labelled him a plain Keynesian in the info box. Cant beleive I did that, as many consider there are major differences between the two schools. Thanks for pointing this out! FeydHuxtable (talk) 13:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James K. Galbraith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)