User talk:WojPob

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

20:43 Mar 5, 2003 WojPob deleted "Wikipedia:Twaddle" (nonsense, no content no history no backlinks, deleted)

Hey WojPob, what is Twaddle, anyway? -- Waveguy

Hey, WojPob -- welcome back. Since this is the English-language wikipedia, could you please find translations for your article titles? No English speaker is ever going to look up the Polish secret police agency under its Polish name -- which means that the article is fairly useless, unless youu know what the Polish name for their secret police is, which English speakers mostly wouldn't....JHK

Nice edit on Slytherin -- your English is clearly better than mine! Jinkuyeh. User:Ed Poor

Important note for all sysops: There is a bug in the administrative move feature that truncates the moved history and changes the edit times. Please do not use this feature until this bug is fixed. More information can be found in the talk of Brion VIBBER and maveric149. Thank you. --maveric149

Hi there, you have been listed as "inactive" on Wikipedia:Administrators. Please remove the notice when it is out of date. Cheers, Cyan 01:36, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)

WojPob, good plan to make the "duplicate articles" page. Regarding the first entry there, the Crimean War - I did a major rewrite on one of them once, but I cannot promise right now to do any work on the merging. I did note that the "other" article is mostly factual information in some list form - it should therefore not be too difficult to merge the two. Jeronimo

Hello Wojtek, I just found the article on the Polish island of Wolin; there is another article about "Wollin peninsula" (you edited this article yourself) - maybe you know more about Polish geography: Is there really a peninsula in addition to the island called Wolin, or do both articles describe the same place? I was about to delete the "Wollin peninsula" article and merge the contents with the "Wolin" article, but I decided first to ask someone, who could know about this. Greetings, Cordyph

Welcome back! I haven't seen you in ages. Koyaanis Qatsi 08:01 Jan 23, 2003 (UTC)

I don't know if you're sympathetic to this cause, but I need support in trying to keep football at football. They want to move it to soccer, please see talk:list of footballers. Mintguy 10:12 Feb 19, 2003 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution to the debate about football. I felt outgunned and needed all the support I could muster. Thanks. Mintguy

Greetings...thanks for the kind welcome...quite a world inside here! Brettz9

Wow, quick work on kulturkampf. You beat my blank right after the article was created. ;) -- goatasaur

Hello WojPob, why did you blank Dobeles county, the only comment in the history is removed, but no reason is given. -- JeLuF 08:17 Apr 6, 2003 (UTC)

Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies please vote to keep it. Cautious 20:56, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)


If you ever happen to drop by again there are a handful of images that you uploaded that are missing information as to their source. It would helpful if you could add Image copyright tags to them. If they continue to lack source information they will regrettably have to be deleted. Below is the list of such images. - SimonP 22:11, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:


Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Main namespace cleanup[edit]

In an effort to clean up the main namespace, I've moved your old main namespace userpage to User:WojPob/old, as there's some edit history you might want to keep. Otherwise just delete it. --fvw* 12:29, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)


WikiThanks.png Thank you for your contribution at Pune.
Please keep it up!!! - P R A D E E P Somani (talk)
Feel free to send me e-mail.

Unspecified source for Image:Surgery pd.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Surgery pd.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

hay...[edit] you ever still log on cause if you do respond

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Proposed mergers[edit]

Wikipedia:Proposed mergers, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Proposed mergers (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Proposed mergers during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 15:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Your user page[edit]

I found your old user page while checking out some old edits. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 05:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Notice of change[edit]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

Just to let you know[edit]

I would like to upload a image to the page, but having some problems finding the correct way. Any assistance? You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians Ottawahitech (talk) 14:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Turing (programming language)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Turing (programming language) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All sources are affiliated with Holtsoft, creators of Turing. Non-notable programming language as it fails WP:GNG, no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 04:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

IndustrY listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IndustrY. Since you had some involvement with the IndustrY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Theosophist (talk) 04:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Novella for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Novella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novella until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 15:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
thanks for creating the musicians article! :) Wesreu (talk) 02:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

love ur work[edit]

Love your work!

a anonymous person...

BusinessAndIndustry listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BusinessAndIndustry. Since you had some involvement with the BusinessAndIndustry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Business and economics listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Business and economics. Since you had some involvement with the Business and economics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:19, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

ok 3[edit]

Prova 3

— Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 02:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society[edit]

Fifteen Year Society userbox.svg

Dear WojPob,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

"EconomicS" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect EconomicS. Since you had some involvement with the EconomicS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Lmatt (talk) 23:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

"AmericA" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg A discussion is taking place to address the redirect AmericA. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#AmericA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)